CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND CONSUMERS’ WASTE SORTING HABITS

Solveiga Blumberga, Ance Saulīte

Abstract


The transition to circular economy shifts attention to re-use, repair, restoration and recycling of materials and products. What was previously considered to be waste can be turned into resources. The transition to a circular economy where the value of products, materials and resources is maintained for as long as possible and where as little waste is generated as possible is a significant contribution to the common effort in the European Union to create a sustainable low-carbon economy in which resources are used efficiently. Such an approach allows to transform the EU economy and generate new advantages for it (European Commission, 2015). Our individual action and provided support may help peers notice an opportunity and a solution for the future. The aims of the study are: To investigate the evaluation of the significance of the consumers’ corporate social responsibility and waste-sorting habits and to provide recommendations for improved access to the separate waste collection service. The research questions for achieving the objectives of the study were the following: How do consumers evaluate corporate social responsibility of companies in general? What are the waste-sorting habits of consumers? Are there statistically significant differences in the waste-sorting habits between various consumer generations? The authors prepared a unique consumer survey in which economically active inhabitants of the capital of Latvia, aged 15 to 71 years, participated. The results of our survey showed that the respondents rated the corporate social responsibility of companies as essential and emphasized that it was important for the large-size enterprises to operate ethically. The waste-sorting process itself creates disbelief among the respondents and also suspicion that all sorted waste is lumped together and removed to disposal sites.

Keywords


CSR, waste sorting, habits, generations, circular economy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barrett, W. (2004, August 25). Responsibility, Accountability and Corporate Activity. Retrieved from: http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=2480

Crane, A., Matten, D. and Spence, L. I. (Eds). (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility. Readings and cases in a Global Context. (2nd ed.). Oxon: Routledge

Duhigg, C. (2012). The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business. NewYork: Random House.

European Commission (2015). Circular Economy Strategy. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/

Mullinns, L. (2005). Management and Organisational Behavior (7th ed.). New York: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.

Olson, P. & Brescher, H. (2011). The Power of 4. The Four Generations: Who They Are [PDF file]. Adayana. Retrieved from: http://www.vertexsolutionsgrp.com/sites/default/files/docs/whitepapers/The%20Four%20Generations%202011-03_2.pdf

Parker, C., C. (2007). Generational differences in work life balance attitudes [Master thesis]. Retrieved from DSpace: https://dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu/bitstream/handle/1951/43099/Parker%20thesis121807.pdf?sequence=1

Rahmann, S. (2011). Evaluation of Definitions: Ten Dimensions of Corporate Social Responsibility. World Review of Business Research, 1(1). 166-176.

Tolbize, A. (2008). Generational differences [PDF file]. Minesot: Research and Training Center on Community. Retrieved from: http://rtc.umn.edu/docs/2_18_Gen_diff_workplace.pdf

Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R. and George, G. (Eds.) (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: an Overview and New Research Directions. Academy of Management Journal 59 (2) 534-544. doi: 10.5465/amj.2016.5001




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v5.901

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN 1805-997X, Online ISSN 1805-9961

(c) 2016 Central Bohemia University