Political Idea And Investments Safety

Vaidotas Matutis


In this paper we discussing about the potential threats to the investments safety evaluation system, creating the model of the system analysis methods when a new political concept is raised in the country. Traditionally, as we already know that politic and economic are inextricably linked. We can easily assure in it using the historical overview of the political and economic interactions. So the question: how the investment safeties are depending from political environment when a new political concept is raised in the country? Become actual and important. The method assumptions suggested and discussed in this paper are made according to the summaries of public surveys and research results of sociologists, political scientists and psychologists of different countries. These summaries are made analyzing the survey and research results systematically and separately from the variety of their initial objectives. We construct the dimensional frame of references combining the time axes, government forms scale, ideology scale and call they Politological system of axis. It help to us show that if a new political concept is raised in the country, it will be supported and developed by the majority of society members only if its political-ideological essence is possible to show in the chosen politological frame of reference and the point are possible to mark in the area of the most typical structures of the statistical division of the society individuals’ approaches at the set point of time and the deviance of this concept is not forecast in the nearest future. The methods we are discussing provide the specialists with the opportunity to evaluate the possibilities of inside threats to the investments safety still in the political concept raising process and its political-ideological core. To summarize this discussion, we can make once more conclusion as following: the main threat to the investments safety after the new political concept raising is the prejudice of the social characters’ majority. Such graphic and many-sided reflection of the analyzed and summarized politological researches shows the perspective forecasts and assumptions of the formulated political and economical analytics.


Investments Safety, Evaluation System, Government Forms, Ideology Scale, Politological Frame, Democracy, Ideology.

Full Text:



Indriūas A. V., Siaurukas J. G. Socialinis liberalizmas ir kitos politinės ideologijos. – Vilnius: Firidas, 2006.

Makštutis A. S., Kotliar V. S., Mai I. J., Aliaėv A. V. Menedžėment i globalizacija v XXI veke. – Maskva: Kanonj, 2006.

Castells M. Tinklaveikos visuomenės raida. – Kaunas: Poligrafija ir informatika, 2005.

Lietuva ir pasaulis: bendradarbiavimas ir konfliktas. Tarptautinės konferencijos pranešimai. – Vilnius: VAGA, 2000.

Nietzsche F. Stabų saulėlydis. – Vilnius: Strofa, 2000.

Makštutis A. Strateginis planavimas globalizacijos sąlygomis. – Vilnius: Generolo Jono Žemaičio Lietuvos karo akademija, 2006.

Shumpeter J. Kapitalizmas, socializmas ir demokratija. – Vilnius: Mintis, 1998.

Stone D. Viešosios politikos paradoksai: sprendimų priėmimo menas politikoje. – Vilnius: Eugrimas, 2004.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/snsj.v2i0.265


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Online ISSN 1804-9710

(c) 2017 Central Bohemia University