SPECIAL ASPECTS OF THE MODERN WORLD ECONOMY: TRANSITION FROM A UNIPOLAR TO A MULTIPOLAR WORLD SYSTEM

Irina V. Minakova, Tatyana N. Bukreeva, Оlga I. Solodukhina, Оlga G. Timofeeva

Abstract


This paper reveals the consequences of the unipolar system of the world economy provided by the United States leadership in the military-technological, financial-economic, geopolitical and information-ideological spheres. It was established that after the collapse of the socialist camp, the concepts of ‘humanitarian intervention’ and ‘spreading democracy’ were brought to the forefront. In practice, Western European countries have demonstrated their readiness to judge the solutions of domestic political disputes in other countries of the world, especially when it comes to geopolitically important countries. A series of ‘colour revolutions’ have become a demonstration of this policy. Therefore, the globalization of the modern world does not mean the homogenization of development indicators of countries’, but instead leads to further delamination and inequality. The gap between the world leaders and the rest of the world in terms of indicators reflecting the dynamics of the standard of living, the quality of life, scientific and technological progress, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, has significantly increased.

It is illustrated that attempts of the US to consolidate its hegemony in the form of ‘leadership’ in the world had led to the erosion of international legal principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter. Therefore, the United States attempts to solve the problems in Iraq and Afghanistan unilaterally has failed.The objective and subjective signs of a global restructuring of the existing unipolar world system are revealed.


Keywords


unipolar world, international relations, world economic, global management.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baluev D., Novoselov A. (2010). The «grey zones» of world politics. Essay on current politics, issue, 3.

Bogaturov A.D. (2004) Ponyatie mirovoj politiki v teoreticheskom diskurse [The Notion of «World Politics» in Theorizing International Relations ] . Moscow: International processes, 1 (4), 16-33.

Bogaturov A.D. (2003) Mezhdunarodnyy poryadok v nastupivshem veke [International Order at the Turn of the XXI Century]. Moscow: International processes, 1. Retrieved from URL: www. intertrends.ru/one/001.htm.

Brzezinski Zb. (2009). The Group of Two that could change the world. Financial Times. January. Retrieved from URL: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d99369b8-e178-11dd-afa0-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1.

Sulakshin S.S. (2016) Rossiya i mir. Rossiyskiy mirovoy proyekt [Russia and the World. Russian World Order]. Retrieved from http://www. bfm.ru/news/2010/11/22/fskn-mirovoj-godovoj-oborot-narkotikov-sostavil–500-mlrd. Html.

Shveic M. (2012). Novyy mirovoy narkoporyadok [The new order in drug world] Retrieved from http://www. Rosbalt.ru/main/2012/03/19/959078.html.

Armaments disarmaments and international security (2012). Retrieved from https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2016-03/SIPRIYB12Summary.pdf

State Of The Union Address. (1994). Retrieved from http://www. washingtonpost. com/wp-srv/politics/special/states/docs/sou94.htm.

Huntington S. (1999). The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs. March/April.

Huntington S., Samuel P. (1993) The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 3.

Kegley Ch.W., Raymond G. (1994) A Multipolar Peace? Great-Power Politics in the Twenty-First Century. N.Y., 1994.

Kissinger H. (2009) The Chance for a New World Order. The New York Times. January 12.

Kissinger, Henry A. (2011) How to exit Afghanistan without creating wider conflict. The Washington Post. June. Retrieved from URL: http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-to-exit-afghanistan-withoutcreating-wider-conflict/2011/06/06/AG9ydPLH_story.html.

Minakova I.V., Kovarda V.V. (2015). Novyye yavleniya v mezhdunarodnykh ekonomicheskikh otnosheniyakh [The new phenomena in the international economic relations]. Kursk: Publishing house: University Book closed joint stock company, 46-49.

Ponomareva E.G. (2011) Euroasian versus project new world order. Retrieved from URL: http://www. fondsk.ru/news/2011/10/07/evrazijskij-proekt-versus-novyj-mirovojporjadok.html.

Report on human development of 2013. Eminence of the South: human progress in the diverse world. M.: UN, 160–161.

Slaughter A-M. (2012) A Grand Strategy of Network Centrality in America’s path: grand strategy for the next administration, Center for a New American Security (Richard Fontaine and Kristin M. Lord, eds.). May 31.

Waltz K. (2000) Globalization and American Power. The National Interest. Spring.

Waltz K. (1993) The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security, 2.

Yakunin V.I., Sulakshin S.S., etc. (2012) Politicheskoye izmereniye mirovykh finansovykh krizisov. [Political dimension of the world financial crises.]. Moscow: Scientific expert, 189–199.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v6.1182

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN 1805-997X, Online ISSN 1805-9961

(c) 2018 CBU Research Institute s.r.o.

For more information on the conference visit cbuic.cz